On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> Am 19.01.2017 um 15:32 schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti:
>> On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Sven Schreiber wrote:
>>
>>> Secondly, my proposal is that before a package is allowed to appear in
>>> the menus it would need to pass some additional checks. For example,
>>> this check could be provided by replicating in the example script some
>>> known-good result.
>>
>> I don't like this very much. When you install a package, you give it
>> explicit permission to show up in the main GUI somewhere, so you can't
>> claim "nobody told me".
>
> You have a point about the explicit menu permission. And maybe the relevant
> threshold shouldn't have to do with the menus. But I think we agree that
> the level of quality assurance is different between core gretl and the
> contributed packages. And I believe it should be communicated to users that
> they're taking a somewhat higher risk with contributed packages.
Or lower! Imagine contributions by, say, J Davidson, T Sargent or J
MacKinnon. I'd trust their code much more than mine! ;)
Well, we wish! But not a practical issue (yet).
> In the world of R, my impression is that users are aware that
they're
> leaving core R when they're using packages from CRAN. For the gretl world
> I'm having doubts about this, perhaps because of the extremely nice GUI
> integration of packages...
Hmmm, I don't quite agree with this. Most R users i know just type
"library(foobarbaz)" away without even thinking about it.
My impression is that Jack is right on this. If you're an
econometrician using R you'll have to be installing add-on libraries
since there's not much econometrics in core R, and I suspect that's
seen as just routine by most users.
Allin