On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 1:43 PM Sven Schreiber <svetosch(a)gmx.net> wrote:
Am 21.11.2020 um 11:58 schrieb Sven Schreiber:
> Am 20.11.2020 um 23:28 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
>> On Fri, 20 Nov 2020, Allin Cottrell wrote:
>>
>> The difference is between equation_system_bundlize() and
>> gretl_VAR_bundlize(): the former was converting to 1-based t1 and t2,
>> the latter not. The latter is now fixed in git.
>
> OK great!
> BTW I think some naming harmonization wouldn't hurt, either
> gretl_system_bundlize (with gretl_) or VAR_bundlize (without gretl_). I
> guess it could also just be system_bundlize.
I'm trying to understand further the naming convention (or historical
path dependence). It seems the gretl_ prefix is quite common in
libgretl, and that actually the various functions starting with
"equation_system_" are the exception.
My suggestion for harmonization is therefore to add the prefix gretl_
also to the systems-related functions. Perhaps "gretl_equation_system_"
is a bit too long, and actually the "equation" part feels a bit
redundant IMHO. So what about this replacement rule for libgretl:
*equation_system_* -> *gretl_system_*
OK to apply?
Let's talk about this first, please.
Allin