Re: [Gretl-devel] Fwd: [gretl:feature-requests] #90 Need help

On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Sven Schreiber wrote: Am 20.11.2015 um 16:06 schrieb Allin Cottrell: > > Granted, we may need to go in that direction. However, I think we should >> consider the options carefully. I don't much like the idea of relevant >> dicussion being split/dispersed across sites and formats: if we start up >> a forum, would we then close down the gretl-users list? >> > > Yes I guess so, because you're absolutely right that fragmentation is no > good. (But of course all this is conditional, _if_...) > >> >> Also, while forums are available on SF I don't think we should >> automatically assume that's the best way to go -- if we do go for a >> forum. Some of SF's interfaces are good, and some horrible (e.g. their >> mailing list interface). We'd probably want to "shop around" a bit first. >> > > Yes again. OTOH I have been pleasantly surprised with the ease of > handling and replying to stuff on the sourceforge bug tracker. > Effectively it seemed to me that you can choose whether you answer to > the automated email copy or whether you write on the web page, and the > result is the same. Did you experience any downsides with the tracker > interface -- well apart from the prolonged outage I mean. > I agree, I like the SF tracker interface, particularly once I (too) discovered that you can just reply by email if you prefer. Allin _______________________________________________ Gretl-devel mailing list Gretl-devel(a)lists.wfu.edu http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-devel