Re: [Gretl-devel] bandwidth default for nadarwat()
Am 23.05.2018 um 17:10 schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti:
On Wed, 23 May 2018, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote:
>> So should we go with this default?
>
> I like this.
>
Hm, hold on a second.
We also use the bandwidth argument to flag if we want the
leave-one-out estimator or not (via its sign).
I'm afraid the best way to handle this would be introducing a
backward-incompatible change. I can't see an easy way out of this.
Well, the default then would not work for this leave-one-out thing,
requiring an explicit input, but that's it. I don't know how popular
this leave-out-variant is, would it be so bad? (Not worse than the
status quo, mind you.)
In general the whole issue is not a big thing of course.
thanks,
sven