Re: [Gretl-devel] still some function package editing problems
Allin Cottrell schrieb:
On reflection case B seems more likely, so I've made things behave the
way you were expecting.
And it works nicely, thank you!
My next suggestion -- wait, before I go on let me repeat that all this
is not very important, it's just my 2 €-ct on what I believe to be the
best function package experience...
-- ok, so IMHO gretl should not allow to leave the return value name
empty in the package call GUI. Right now it seems possible to not
provide a name for the returned object and still call the function. As a
result it appears that the return value is discarded. I cannot see the
use of that behavior, so I propose that gretl catches that specific user
input error.
Just don't waste too much energy on this... real bug-fixing is certainly
more important.
cheers,
sven