On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Sven Schreiber wrote:
[Sorry, but I'll skip the > 1 quotation levels, since they get a
bit confusing here.]
(I still don't buy the underlying argument, though...)
I think you may have mistaken Jack's point. I took him to be
saying that a "milestone release" that is mostly just backward
incompatible changes is likely to please few people and annoy
quite a number. Clean-up is pleasing to the coders, and to
folks such as yourself you are concerned with consistency and
syntax-cleanliness (and rightly so) but not to many "punters".
So the idea (or at least, my idea, but I think it's Jack's) is
that if we're going to do a substantial clean-up we have to
sweeten the deal with some substantial new functionality. "It's
worth the bother of updating your old gretl scripts because look
what new gretl is offering!"
Allin.