Re: [Gretl-devel] a very strange case of arima (poor)... new script

I it was just poorly selected English word I meant I was disappointed to see results of the first script and didn't mean to characterize intentions. I was disappointed since I forgot to insert smpl 1 194 into the first code (with my_arima) With smpl 1 194 mean(diff_series) is O(10^-18) and everything looks quite different --x-12-arima comparison showed that my transformations do actually nothing to --x-12-arima estimation results In my opinion this is an evidence that they do something similar Actually I have thought they did, analysing the behavior of their estimates and based on this conjecture I proposed the transformations Oleh 1 листопада 2018, 00:04:18, від "Allin Cottrell" <cottrell(a)wfu.edu&gt;: On Wed, 31 Oct 2018, oleg_komashko(a)ukr.net wrote: Thanks, Oleh. I didn't mean for my verdict to be humiliating, but anyway... you have clearly shown that standardizing any exogenous variables and "standardize plus 1" for the dependent can help quite a bit in case of tricky data. I'll follow up on this when I get some time. Allin _______________________________________________ Gretl-devel mailing list Gretl-devel(a)lists.wfu.edu http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-devel