El 22/06/15 a las 15:31, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti escribió:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> Well apart from the fact that by coincidence you could already have a
> totally unrelated series named "reskwh_H" in your dataset, it's not
> me who's saying it's a problem! It's Allin who's saying that it
> becomes a problem when you call the function without assigning the
> list return name.
And I agree 100% with Allin!
>> The problem that may occur of overwritting some important previous
>> series should be resolved by the package programmer who should select
>> the names for the generated series carefully.
>
> Absolutely.
And how, exactly? This would require clairvoyance. How am I, the
package writer, supposed to know that the package will never be used
on a dataset that contains a series by the name well_this_should_be_safe?
Well Jack, please change "resolved" by "minimized" and better use
wEll_THiSs_shoulD_be_sAFe ;-))
--
Ignacio Díaz-Emparanza
Departamento de Economía Aplicada III (Econometría y Estadística)
Universidad del País Vasco - Euskalherriko Unibertsitatea, UPV/EHU
Tfno: (+34) 94 601 3732
http://www.ehu.eus/ea3