Re: [Gretl-devel] Presentation of model results
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> OK, here's one more go at it:
> http://ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu/~cottrell/dougherty/table.html now
> shows two variants of the table, one with primarily "vertical
> association" of closely related stats and one with primarily
> row-wise association.
>
> At this point I don't have a strong preference. Any votes/further
> suggestions?
Actually, I now see a reason for preferring the "row-wise"
variant: this makes it easier to cut out the F-stat and its
p-value if they're not applicable for a given model.
So, could the following (Allin's proposal with the adj. R^2 and the
F-statistic swapped) be a reasonable compromise?
Sum squared resid 59.23226 Mean dependent var 2.962500
S.E. of regression 0.473671 S.D. dependent var 0.615864
R-squared 0.419454 Adjusted R-squared 0.408459
F(5, 264) 38.14888 P-value(F) 2.14e-29
Log-likelihood -178.3244 Akaike criterion 368.6488
Schwarz criterion 390.2393 Hannan-Quinn 377.3186
rho 0.435670 Durbin-Watson 2.036421
I'd still like to have the information criteria on their own, but I
understand not many people share my preference.
Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti
Dipartimento di Economia
Università Politecnica delle Marche
r.lucchetti(a)univpm.it
http://www.econ.univpm.it/lucchetti