Re: [Gretl-devel] Getting ACF/PACF/XCF as a matrix

On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Allin Cottrell wrote: > On overloaded functions, I'll just say, think about writing the > help entry for the function: if it seems too crazy, give up the > idea of overloading... On second thoughts, I'm coming round to the idea of a single function. What about this: corrgm(series y, scalar p) -> p x 2 matrix with ACF and PACF, like the corrgm command corrgm(series y1, series y2, scalar p) -> p x 1 matrix with cross-correlogram

We could accept column vectors in place of series.

For the sake of clarity of the interface I don't particularly like the idea of accepting list arguments.

(where the syntax "func(args)[slice]" is newly supported in CVS).