Re: [Gretl-devel] another ternary woe

Am 02.05.2017 um 16:45 schrieb Allin Cottrell: > On Tue, 2 May 2017, Sven Schreiber wrote: >> Just a quick follow-up: I stumbled over a similar issue again (in my >> johansensmall.gfn package), and given your response the workaround is >> clear. But I noticed that the error message (with 2017a) is that (the >> equivalent of) the symbol "garbl" is undefined, whereas above/before I had >> reported the error to be "[ invalid". Don't know if that has a deeper >> meaning or if it's expected for you. > > Well, I thought that was an improvement in the error message. But maybe it > isn't. I suppose a really explicit message would have to be something like > > Can't make sense of "garbl[..." since the symbol "garbl" is undefined. The current message is definitely better than the previous one. Your new suggestion (if feasible) would indeed be optimal I guess. I just wasn't sure if there was an intended change by you triggering this, or if something else was going on.