Re: [Gretl-devel] fdjac doc typo?

Ok, the fdjac function is very cool, I just discovered it this week, and after some heavy scripting it has given me some very useful results. Thanks for this great functionality! (And for the excellent documentation, I wouldn't have even known the function existed without it. From the start of my involvement with gretl I have always been impressed by the quality and extent of the docs, it's really a big argument in favor of gretl!) Now, it seems to me that fdjac does not accept more than two matrix arguments. When I had a version where a (redundant) third matrix was passed --apart from theta and another necessary input matrix-- I just got a zero Jacobian matrix as a result (mind you, no error, which was not nice either). Then I removed that redundant argument and everything was ok. If so, it should be documented (or fixed?). I know I know, I should give an example, but right now I can't, maybe later. thanks, sven