Re: [Gretl-devel] 'for' not reserved
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Sven Schreiber wrote:
Hi,
another question on whether it's intended (or wise...) or not:
<hansl>
clear
for = 1 # works
print for # prints out 1
function void for(void) # gretl doesn't complain
print "ouf"
end function
for() # error "unexpected ("
</hansl>
First, I'm wondering whether 'for' shouldn't simply be made a
reserved word.
Yes, clearly. That's now done in git.
Allin