Re: [Gretl-devel] obsolete use of "=" as Boolean test: please use "=="
W dniu 27.01.2017 o 15:42, Allin Cottrell pisze:
then sees that "transp(m)" is not an lvalue, so the only
sense it can
make of the following "=" is that it's supposed to be a
I see.
That's why I expected an error on transp(m) = ... .
a syntax error for "transp(m) = {0, 1; 2, 3}". Part of the
reason why
I want to ban "=" for "==" is that it'll be easier to get
I would say that using "==" is not only in-line with C convension but
it's a matter of style: we have all logic operands based on 2-char
mnemonics.
Marcin
--
Marcin Błażejowski