Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti schrieb:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Apr 2008, Allin Cottrell wrote:
>
>>> BTW, during debugging (using a bunch of 'funcerr' statements), I
>>> stumbled over other quirks:
>>>
>>> 1) At some point I got an error saying "IF depth exceeded" or
>>> something like that. Now I don't nest that many IF blocks, so I
>>> guess this happened because I repeatedly interrupted functions
>>> in the middle of IF blocks by using 'funcerr'. But that suggests
>>> that some "stacks" (or whatever they're called) are not
properly
>>> cleaned up when a function exits with an error...
>>
>> Yes, I suppose that must be the case.
>>
>
> This probably isn't your case, but I remember I ran into this once,
> only to discover, after many swearwords, that I had and "if" without
> an "endif" somewhere.
tiny script exposing the problem:
<script>
nulldata 10
a = 3
loop 33
if a>1
print a
end loop
</script>
So you're saying that gretl's parser should detect such syntax errors,
right?
/sven