Am 08.05.2024 um 23:08 schrieb Cottrell, Allin:
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 3:58 PM Sven Schreiber
<sven.schreiber(a)fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> Agreed, this needs to be fixed in the package. However, from the
> timeline of the release of gretl 2024a on April 5th, it would mean that
> the package should have failed already in the run-up to the release. My
> question then is, why didn't we notice? I thought it's a standard part
> of the testing parcours to check the sample scripts of all packages.
You're right. I'm afraid there was a testing failure in this case. All
the gfns had been tested probably a day before the March 29 change,
and at the time it didn't seem that anything "significant" had changed
between then and the April 5 release. But that's a risky assumption,
and not one I'll make in future. Obviously, it would be good if I were
not the only person testing all the gfns' sample scripts in the run-up
to a release.
Yes, we should better distribute those tasks.
thanks
sven