On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Allin Cottrell <cottrell(a)wfu.edu> wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote:
> This said, I've begun to think about the usefulness of having
those two
> functions at all. Clearly, they're no use for cross-section data.
No quite true, see below.
Hmm, on second thoughts Jack might be right about that; with cross-
section data one would probably use smpl --no-missing to ensure
that the sample contained no NAs, if necessary.
Allin