On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza wrote:
El Tuesday 27 November 2007 04:00:56 Allin Cottrell escribió:
>
> I'll be travelling for 10 days or so, leaving the day after
> tomorrow. So for me it's a question of release what we have
> tomorrow or release in a couple of weeks.
>
> I'm open as to which we do. On the one hand it's a long time
> since the last release and we've accumulated a large number of
> bug-fixes; on the other, this is a point in the academic year when
> people are not likely to be starting things, and looking for a
> shiny new gretl release. Thoughts?
>
I also think it's a long time since last release. In particular here in Bilbao
there are people waiting ansiously for the new official version (It will be
the first official version fully translated to Basque).
BTW don't you think that with all these bug-fixes and new advanced features it
deserve to be numbered 1.7 (or even 2.0, since it is completely different
from 1.0)?
As long as the only pending issue is the Heckit thing, I'm ok with
releasing now. I've just committed a tiny addition to the help xml files
for the "heckit" command, in English and Italian. If my Spanish had been
up to par, I'd have saved Ignacio the work, but I'm sorry I don't feel
confident enough.
As for the version number, 1.7 may well be warranted IMO. On the other
hand, major version number changes are usually associated with backward
incompatibilities in the library; not that libgretl is very much used
outside of gretl itself (that I know of), but I still think it's nicer to
follow established conventions.
Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti
Dipartimento di Economia
Università Politecnica delle Marche
r.lucchetti(a)univpm.it
http://www.econ.univpm.it/lucchetti