Re: [Gretl-devel] exponential MA smoothing filter
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza wrote:
> Not really. We have to put something in the default and I suppose the
> mean of the whole series is a correct posibility for stationary data.
I just did a CVS commit that ought to fix the time displacement bug.
Allin, could you have a look when you have time?
The original coding of EMA was confusing, sorry. I've tried to
clarify it in CVS; please check that I haven't screwed it up.
Allin.