On Tue, 9 Jan 2018, Schaff, Frederik wrote:
> But one (somewhat relevant) point is that it's now OK (in
recent
> git) to skip one or more optional arguments altogether, provided
> one inserts commas to preserve the argument count where
> necessary. (Commas are not required if only trailing optional
> arguments are skipped.)
>
> For example, if a function foo() takes three arguments, with the
> last two optional, and a caller wishes to supply only arguments 1
> and 3, then
>
> foo(x,,z)
>
> is an acceptable call.
>
> Allin
Hi there,
that is indeed very nice, for one has not to take care of the type
that is missing (up to now I skipped with null, which also works
if null is a valid default).
PS: Now that I am delving more and more into hansl, I also love it
more and more. It is really cool, (relatively) simple and very
powerful. So thanks for the great service you provide for people
like me!
Thanks! It's good to see someone "pushing the envelope" on hansl
usage. We'll see if we can improve matters in regard to some of the
points you have raised recently.
Allin