Am 06.12.2020 um 17:31 schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti:
On Sun, 6 Dec 2020, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> what do you think about introducing a more self-explanatory
command
> keyword for the coint2 command? I would suggest "cointjoh", hinting at
> Johansen's name. The "2" in coint2 is purely historical and
> path-dependent, and quite opaque. But of course coint2 can stay for
> backwards compatibility?
I like the idea. As for the new name, why not just "johansen"?
Sure, why not!
cheers
sven