Re: [Gretl-devel] strange behavior of arima on Windows 10

> On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, oleg_komashko(a)ukr.net wrote: > Dear Allin, > Note that Windows 8 gives absolutely the same visible > digits as Linux. Also, these estimates have at least 4 > coinciding digits in comparison with using --x-12-arima > In contrast, for the constant we have 10% difference > between Windows 10 and (the same) Linux, Windows 8, > and (almost the same --x-12-arima). > So it is very unlikely due to rounding errors. > Also, I used --verbose option: the initialization steps > were different on Windows 10. > I think, it may be more convenient to compare Windows 8 (which is obviously > correct) > and Windows 10: they have more in common in comparison with Linux. Comparing Windows 8 with Windows 10 is not meaningful unless you're using exactly the same gretl package on both platforms (same build-date, same word-length): I update my cross-compilers for 32-bit and 64-bit Windows from time to time, and also update the OpenBLAS sources from time to time. And I'm not in a position to test on Windows 8 any more, though I can test on Windows 10; I'll do so when I next get a chance. Allin _______________________________________________ Gretl-devel mailing list Gretl-devel@lists.wfu.eduhttp://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-devel