Re: [Gretl-devel] small bug with const series
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza wrote:
A colleague here tried to do this (please don't ask why):
series c1 = const - 0.9*const(-1)
We don't need to ask -- whoever dreamt this up either has a severe
comprehension problem or just wanted to see what would happen when you
torture gretl ;-)
obtaining this strange result:
c1
1959
1960 0.1000
1961 0.9100000
1962 0.1810000
1963 0.8371000
1964 0.2466100
1965 0.7780510
1966 0.2997541
1967 0.7302213
1968 0.3428008
1969 0.6914793
Not only that, but after this exercise "const" is messed up. In this
instance gretl did not pass the torture test. We'll fix that shortly.
Allin