Allin Cottrell schrieb:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> 3) next method: same as in (2), but encapsulate that in a function which
> does the conversion and plotting; the effect is that the sample of the
> dataset isn't affected because it's outside the function scope
>
> problem:
> * after the function is done, the series are also gone (though it may
> work to pass them back somehow using another dirty workaround, haven't
> tried that)
No dirty workaround required, just return a list.
Thanks for the detailed reply. I guess I can live with doing the
conversion from matrix to series in a function and then returning the
created series in a list -- but I still do consider it a bit of a dirty
workaround just to do the conversion :-)
thanks also for the other experimental matrix plotting feature!
cheers,
sven