On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza wrote:
El mar, 26-01-2010 a las 09:28 -0500, Allin Cottrell escribió:
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza wrote:
> >
> > > Not really. We have to put something in the default and I suppose the
> > > mean of the whole series is a correct posibility for stationary data.
> >
> > I just did a CVS commit that ought to fix the time displacement bug.
> > Allin, could you have a look when you have time?
>
> The original coding of EMA was confusing, sorry. I've tried to
> clarify it in CVS; please check that I haven't screwed it up.
I think it is OK now. But please could you correct the descriptive
labels of the ema_ and emc_ resulting series? The value of "current
weight" reported is one minus the value you write in the dialog box, and
I think this should be the same value.
OK, I see what you mean. That's now fixed in CVS.
Allin.