On Sun, 14 Dec 2014, Sven Schreiber wrote:
Am 04.12.2014 um 21:27 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2014, Sven Schreiber wrote:
>
>>>
>>> I tried a little test program on Windows 8. It turns out that the C
>>> library does return 0 for all comparisons involving a NaN (>, < and
>>> ==), as it should. Nonetheless, qsort() with our original simple
>>> callback sorts NaN (invoked via 0.0/0.0) to the start of an array of
>>> doubles. I don't know how that happens!
>>
>> sorry for being clueless, but what is qsort() -- gretl's internal call
>> to a quicksort algorithm perhaps?
>
> qsort is the standard C library quicksort function (defined in
> stdlib.h). Gretl calls it for sorting -- we haven't felt a need for
> our own quicksort implementation. But to use qsort you need to supply
> your own comparison function for the objects you're sorting (what I'm
> calling the "callback").
Ok, anything I could do to investigate this issue further?
Not really, if you're OK with the current CVS gretl behavior,
whereby NaNs are sorted high on all platforms.
Allin