Am 02.11.2020 um 00:31 schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti:
On Sun, 1 Nov 2020, Allin Cottrell wrote:
>> Then I could do
>>>
>>> stringify(x, S, <some option>)
>>>
>>> and I'd get a series with m distinct values, where m is the number of
>>> distinct strings in S, with numeric codes set to match. Basically
>>> it's a
>>> third way to create a string-valued series, besides importation from a
>>> suitable file and stringification of a series that already holds
>>> suitable numeric codes.
>>
>> Perhaps this could be achieved without an extra option - again, the doc
>> says all positive integers for normal use; so perhaps if x is a
>> zero-valued series this could be taken to mean this alternative usage.
>
> Good idea. We could do that if we reckon it's worthwhile. Any takers
> for the idea?
Sorry guys, I don't mean to be a spoilsport, but what is the advantage
compared to using "time" or "index" for this? As in
<hansl>
nulldata 5
S = defarray("Banks", "Collins", "Gabriel",
"Hackett", "Rutherford")
x = index
stringify(x, S)
print x -o
</hansl>
what if you have repeated values?
-s