Re: [Gretl-devel] inconsistent (incoherent) irf function

On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, Sven Schreiber wrote:

> So I suggest to introduce a matching $irf accessor with the same > layout as the $fevd accessor. I am aware that the irf() function also > needs an alpha input; this could be done via "set irf_alpha 0.1" or > something like that. > > Alternatively, the irf() function could get a new bundle argument > which would collect the VAR/VECM results. That way, no dependency on > non-argument input would be required, making the use consistent with > all other functions. Point taken. But right now I'm busy working on ARMA and I don't want to get distracted. Could you maybe file a bug report or feature request so this doesn't get forgotten?