Re: [Gretl-devel] "NA" revisited
Am 24.07.2018 um 16:18 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
Following discussions between Jack and myself, here's a sort of
"RFC" for changing the internal definition of "NA" in gretl, which we
believe can be done with full backward compatibility.
Little PDF attached.
Thanks for the excellent exposition of the problem. One thing I don't
understand from the document, however, is what would happen in the end
with the NA * 0 = 0 feature when NA becomes nan. AFAICS your point is
that it would be a nice feature but we don't have it currently, anyway,
so let's forget about it forever? (Not saying I'd be against this, just
trying to understand for now.)
thanks,
sven
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 1.1 KB)