[Gretl-devel] Re: eiggen2
On 09.01.2020 20:20, Sven Schreiber wrote:
makes sense in the moment where it is introduced, but not for the
intended long future afterwards.
I can make suggestions if you like, but I'm mostly just bothered by
the 2.
What about "1"? We have "randgen" and
"randgen1" functions.
Marcin
--
Marcin Błażejowski