[Gretl-devel] Re: inverse of stack() function

Am 02.03.2021 15:11 schrieb Sven Schreiber: > Am 26.02.2021 um 10:51 schrieb Sven Schreiber: >> Am 19.02.2021 um 13:52 schrieb Allin Cottrell: >>> On Fri, 19 Feb 2021, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote: >>> I can't think of an easier way of doing this, and your function seems to >>> me a good candidate for "extra". One possible modification would be: >>> >>> function matrix unstack(series x, series names[null], \ >>>     strings S[null]) >>> >>> where the caller needs to supply one of @names or @S, allowing for the >>> possibility that there's no handy series holding group names and you >>> therefore want to submit an array of group names directly. Or, drop the >>> @S argument but be ready to construct automatic names (e.g. "unit%d") in >>> case @names is not given. >>> >> >> Jack, would you take care of pushing this into 'extra', or is further >> discussion needed? >> > Please, what's the status here? Hi, I asked Jack to think about the possibility to make this a (I think) natural extension of my user-contributed "stack_data" package. But no reply, yet ;-)