Re: [Gretl-devel] gqtest 0.17: 0.19
Dear Sven,
Since gretl have no named parameters,
I do not like things like ffff(x,null,null,null,1,1,1,1,null,y)
That's why, I tried to as littele arguments as
possible, to this end I used variant with "const"
with a special meaning. I know how to
make the same with *series argument
but it requires too mach to change inside.
I recall, I tortured myself for several
hours to make all ifs to work properly
As for bug: when the package was .zip,
it have specification to look for directory
called gqtest. It retained in 0.18.
I cant detect it before trying inslalling
the package on PC where there are
no previous versions. Obviously
rebuilding anew excluded any
mentions to the directory name.
To make: abstract:
the code was non changed,
only typos, sample script, and spec
compared to the first uploaded version
Oleh
5 квітня 2016, 01:57:51, від "Sven Schreiber" <svetosch(a)gmx.net>:
Am 04.04.2016 um 22:45 schrieb oleg_komashko(a)ukr.net:
> Dear Sven
> The GUI bug is corrected:
> I rebuilt the package from
> the script with no changes w.r.t. 0.18
> If you do not object,
> I am not very inclined to
> change to *series, since
> the behavior of &const
> is to special,
It's your choice as the package author -- and I have to admit/agree that
having to use the pointer form just to make it possible to set a default
value of no argument doesn't feel very logical. (Cf. the situation with
string arguments where it's possible without pointers.)
The other thing, what you call GUI bug, I haven't really understood, but
it doesn't matter.
I'm going to look at it tomorrow (I hope).
thanks,
sven