Am 21.03.19 um 23:00 schrieb Cottrell, Allin:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 3:02 AM Sven Schreiber
<svetosch(a)gmx.net> wrote:
>
> Am 19.03.2019 um 22:27 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
>>
>> Question: now that we have the isoweek() function we could redefine
>> seasonals() to use ISO 8601 week numbers in the second case rather than
>> just repeating 1 to 52 without regard to the calendar -- would that be
>> worthwhile?
>
> Probably yes. I've looked more closely at the nysewk.gdt dataset and
> added seasonal (periodic) dummies again. The series starts in 1966,
> first date 1966-01-05. Scrolling down to the end of the series, the
> dummy for the first week of the year has the last entry of 1 for the
> date 2005-11-16. I guess that's not really usable.
In git and snapshots weekly seasonals() now use ISO 8601 week
numbers when the data are dated.
Just saw this, Allin. Thank you, this is great!
Artur