[Gretl-devel] Re: short seq() form
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, Sven Schreiber wrote:
Hi,
and sorry, here's another syntactic-sugar feature request. Couldn't
seq(n) be made an equivalent short form for seq(1,n)?
I know, only two keystrokes, but nice to read IMHO and in this context a
25% keystroke savings, hehe.
In my opinion, not so nice to read. Just today, when trying to
understand some R code, I had to look up seq() to confirm what
seq(n) is supposed to mean. OK, I could guess, but seq(1,n) is
transparent.
Allin