On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza wrote:
> Could you explain us the context of this expression to
> translate?
>
> "Critical values for desired LIML maximal size, when running\n
> tests at a nominal 5% significance level:\n"
Hmm, yes, that is a little obscure. It relates to the work by
Sock and Yogo on testing for weak instruments in IV regression.
Stock and Yogo, that is.
Allin.