Hi,
I've only just now noticed the new (name of the) eiggen2 function. I'm
not so happy about the naming. Consider the coint2 function: Nowadays
the "2" is just an anachronism there and is confusing. The numbering
makes sense in the moment where it is introduced, but not for the
intended long future afterwards.
I can make suggestions if you like, but I'm mostly just bothered by the 2.
thanks
sven