Re: [Gretl-devel] update on gretl functions and lists (long)

>>> I also think that this sort of consideration raises another >>> issue: we should add an internal constant, with a $-accessor, >>> representing the gretl version, a.s.a.p. (i.e. in gretl >>> 1.7.6). Thereafter, function writers will be able to program >>> around differences between gretl versions, if they so choose. >> >> That would be good, too. BUt I guess that would also mean that >> in cvs/snapshot versions the number would have to be increased >> right after release, no? > > Or as soon as we introduce a relevant change (backward- or > forward-incompatible) in CVS? Nice idea. Ok: now, the most important things I'd like to see in gretl 2.0. ...