Re: [Gretl-devel] default for lrvar()
Am 06.02.2018 um 20:12 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
On Mon, 5 Feb 2018, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> the doc for lrvar() says that a certain default is used when the
> second param is set to a negative value. Why not make the second param
> optional then (and treat it as -1 when it's omitted)?
OK, that's in git.
Thanks, it's working fine AFAICS.
cheers,
sven