[Gretl-devel] random-effects logit

Dear devels, hope you've had nice holidays so far. I have started using the new random-effects probit in gretl, and I will also try out the fixed-effects logit (conditional) function package soon. I was wondering, however, why (instead of RE-probit or in addition to it) Jack didn't implement the RE-logit. It would seem more natural to have the two logits together (RE and FE), and not an incomplete mix of probit and logit. (I'm aware of the impossibility of FE-probit.) Is it something technical which makes RE-logit more difficult to program? (I really have no idea.) thanks, sven