Am 30.07.2024 um 14:14 schrieb Cottrell, Allin:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 4:34 AM Sven Schreiber
<sven.schreiber(a)fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> Am 28.07.2024 um 14:33 schrieb Sven Schreiber:
>> Am 28.07.2024 um 02:52 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
>>> Ah, your ui-maker specifications for list arguments are out-of-date.
>>> The possibilities are: list_no_singleton, list_no_const and
>>> list_exclude. IIRC it was you who requested the "list_" prefix for
>>> these conditions ;-). See the current function-package doc.
>> ...
>> So that means we have to adjust the (few) packages that use the old
>> style? For example, StrucTiSM does, and maybe some others, too.
> Is this no_singleton vs. list_no_singleton thing visible in the XML code
> in the gfn file?
Yes, you just have to look at the ui-maker function.
OK, I checked all the function packages, and apart from the mentioned
StrucTiSM the constructs without list_ are used in ParMA and in
random_forest.
However: I also read the package doc more thoroughly, and it says there:
"These keywords can also be given in a shorter form, omitting the list_
prefix, ". That would then bring me back to the original question why it
didn't seem to work in the example I gave? (I haven't tested yet whether
it would work with the list_ prefix.)
Thanks
Sven