Re: [Gretl-devel] Midas syntax, small issue
Am 14.09.2017 um 21:44 schrieb Sven Schreiber:
Am 14.09.2017 um 18:56 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
> follows:
>
> 0: "umidas"
> 1: "nealmon"
> 2: "beta0"
> 3: "betan"
> 4: "almonp"
thanks, I think this is very good for readability!
Not sure if gretl should copy Ghysels' package there, but I guess it's
now or never. In his user guide I find the strings (for opt.for.poly):
'umidas'
'beta'
'betann' (non-zero)
'almon'
Not sure which of the Almons 'almon' refers to, though.
cheers,
sven