Re: [Gretl-devel] status

> Ah yes, the Kalman filter would be most welcome and some sort of killer > feature actually! I would even go so far as to say that this should have > priority among the econometric features, because it is so fundamental and > versatile. Most of the other requested functionality could be implemented > via user functions and such, but the Kalman filter should be native. And > after that even more stuff can be done in user functions... > Forgot to add the following, therefore replying to self... I don't think this type of fundamental feature should be stopping a release though. The feature is ready when it is ready, and IMHO there's no point in holding one's breath for it.