Re: [Gretl-devel] Series Creation: An important issue
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Summers, Peter wrote:
Off the top of my head, I think this makes sense. I can't
think of a situation where I'd need to keep x_1 in a data
set as a separate series if it can be generated on the fly.
It does make good sense in the context of some sort of monte
carlo study or other repetitive exercise. But in that case you
could define the lags ahead of time and refer to them by their
series names rather than using the "x(-p)" notation.
I'm not going to change this right away, but it's worth
considering.
Allin
-----Original Message-----
From: gretl-devel-bounces(a)lists.wfu.edu [mailto:gretl-devel-bounces@lists.wfu.edu] On
Behalf Of Allin Cottrell
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 2:45 PM
To: Gretl development
Subject: Re: [Gretl-devel] Series Creation: An important issue
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Henrique Andrade wrote:
> Ok, we will "kill" the automatic series creation in the KPSS test, but
> what about the OLS estimations? In my opinion, Gretl should never
> create series automatically :-)
Ah, you reckon we should destroy any newly created lags after, for example "ols y 0
x(-1)"?
What do others think of that?
Allin
_______________________________________________
Gretl-devel mailing list
Gretl-devel(a)lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-devel
_______________________________________________
Gretl-devel mailing list
Gretl-devel(a)lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-devel
--
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University, NC