On Fri, 1 Mar 2019, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2019, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> Am 01.03.2019 um 20:27 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
>> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019, Sven Schreiber wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> tried to throw out all obs with missings (one series only in a time
>>> series dataset), and when ticking "make permanent" I got an undated
>>> dataset.
>>>
>>> This is with 2019a.
>>
>> Sven, could you give an idea of what you expected here? Seems to me that
>> while discarding a series containing NAs would leave you with a time
>> series dataset, discarding observations is bound to destroy the time
>> series property (unless the NAs were just at the start and/or end of the
>> data).
>
> That's what I meant, an "interior" sample with valid observations and
then
> some junk portions of NA before and after the valid block. At least that's
> what I presumed, maybe I have to check...
OK, on a little simulation I see that case is not being handled
correctly -- i.e. time series structure not preserved on making the
restriction permanent. Fix should be forthcoming before long.
That's now fixed.
Allin