On Mon, 8 Jul 2019, Sven Schreiber wrote:
BTW, I checked the expression "zeros(100,1) * NA" which
still has all
zeros. Now I remember some dispute about the desired result for 0*NA,
but in any case the variant "zeros(100,1) .* NA" gives all 'nan', so
I'm
sure one of the two must be a bug.
Yep, that's inconsistent. For the present I've made 0 * NA equal 0 in
both contexts, which is "traditional" gretl behavior. But we may want
to revise this, given that our NA is now NaN. Thoughts, anyone?
Allin