On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, Sven Schreiber wrote:
Am 02.03.2016 um 00:01 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, Sven Schreiber wrote:
>
>> I absolutely agree that TeX should stay. I just thought that in the
>> meantime there must have been created a decent converter from LaTeX to
>> HTML. But it's been a while since I looked at the issue seriously.
>
> Me too. But I'm pretty confident there has been no "breakthrough" on
> that front. Some LateX to HTML converters work reasonably well for
> simple text, but even then (in my experience) they can't be left to work
> unattended; they require human intervention to sort out the finer
> points. For complex text plus complex mathematics I will eat my
> proverbial hat if there's a half-way adequate converter. (I don't count
> PNG pictures of TeX math as half-way adequate.)
Does anybody know this thing:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaTeXML ?
Interesting. This does seem (at least in principle) much more thorough
than previous LaTeX/HTML convertors. Apparently the author has pretty
much reimplemented the latex executable in perl, with output XML
rather than DVI (plus onward conversion to HTML5). There's also
support for quite a number of standard LaTeX packages, though not
enough to compile the User's Guide to XML at this point.
Allin