Re: [Gretl-devel] syntax inconsistency for coeff vector

On Tue, 2 Dec 2014, Sven Schreiber wrote: > Basically I'm asking for syntactic sugar from a user's point of view so > that the behavior of $coeff() can be matched by b(). This seems to me > like the most natural/intuitive way. "Can do" is perfectly fine with me, > I don't need more "must do", so if b[myvar] stays then it's fine with me. OK, we now accept b(varname) in place of b[varname] in the context of a "restrict" block -- by analogy with the situation for the $coeff accessor.