Am 06.03.2023 um 19:21 schrieb Cottrell, Allin:
On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 10:52 AM Sven Schreiber >
<sven.schreiber(a)fu-berlin.de> wrote: >> >> I suspect that the lrvar
function (long-run variance estimation) is >> slightly wrong in the
panel case. Consider the following example >> [...] > > Well, it's more
than slightly wrong: the current function is only > applicable to
straight time-series data and should not be allowed > for panel data. >
As a stop-gap measure I've put in a block against using it on
panel >
data, with a specific error message. (In git, will shortly be in >
snapshots.) But what, if anything, _should_ we return for panel > data?
An average (weighted or unweighted) of the per-unit long-run > variance
values (as per your script), or a vector of per-unit values, > or ...?
Thanks, Allin. Yes, with panels it gets more complicated, as always. The
two possibilities that you mention are the most natural ones, I guess.
(To be clear, my script didn't consider different per-unit true values,
but used the average of the per-unit statistics to estimate the
homogeneous value.) In principle one could also impose homogeneous
means instead of doing a fixed-effects type demeaning.
cheers
sven