[Gretl-devel] Re: to be marked for translation

On Sun, 19 Apr 2020, Sven Schreiber wrote:

> So what's the preferred workflow for marking another string for > translation? I'd say the first-step change in the C source would be > enough, because eventually you (or somebody else) are going to run the > po-update step when a bunch of new translation gaps have accumulated. No > need to do it every time. Right? Right, unless you really want a newly translated string to show up right away in snapshots. I've perhaps been a bit slow to run po-update of late, but it doesn't have to done on every relevant change in the C sources.