[Gretl-devel] Re: old and new ideas for the next 'extra' addon version

On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 9:42 AM Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti <r.lucchetti(a)univpm.it&gt; wrote: > On Sat, 25 Apr 2020, Sven Schreiber wrote: > >>> Actually, we could go for a name that emphasises the _purpose_ of the >>> function. How about multieq_draw(); then of course we need to explain >>> thoroughly what it does and how in the docs, but IMO the name is nice >>> and easy to remember. >> Hehe, I think I "incepted" you, see three replies earlier. I don't like >> the underscore too much though (but it's not a full veto). syseqdraw? >> multieqdraw? > MultiEqDraw()? I prefer underscores to camel case, but maybe I should shut up since I'm not actively involved in this!